About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
to prosecutors. including the right to a fair and impartial trial. second, open the civil courts to military victims. civilian victims including dod employees, have one critical avenue that is currently unavailable to uniforms personnel and access to civil court. to this day, u.s. supreme court and the federal court below it continued to maintain that service members are barred from negligence or intentional discrimination against the military. depriving it for violations of their rights. congress must ensure that men and women in uniform can access the remedies available for all other individuals under the civil rights act. those who report incidents of absence, the absence of these remedies is especially shameful. today we are looking at an institution that desperately needs to be shown the steps forward. senators do not need to begin survivors. thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you very much. >> thank you for having me here. i have deep gratitude towards those who have worked tirelessly for our voices to be heard and those listening with compassionate and open hearts to make positive ch
to rules, protection for civil rights and civil liberties in the practice on although some. >> i know my time is over. thank you for the latitude of mr. chairman. >> senator baldwin, good to see you. >> i want to also thank the chairman and ranking member for holding this iconography of the department of homeland security. clearly what was accomplished in 2003 was no easy task and i certainly recognize the incredible progress made is the department's creation. since were here today, i want to focus on a cup o. areas in which the department can improve. fortunately for me, senator ayotte's last question is the first question i was going to ask about in terms of recommendations in the gao high-risk report on sharing across agencies. i feel like you've tackled that. i want to also look at another area. mr. dodaro, in your testimony you discuss the high-risk and 2013 limiting the fiscal exposure by better managing in the changer is. our country has certainly seen an increase in events that contributed to significant loss of life and property. they are more and more damaging than the level of
, although you often have to do it repeatedly someone could see you in civil court. there's a surveillance case that came out in favor of the plaintiff. >> so someone could buy one right now? >> you have to get certification from the faa? >> not really. i don't know if this stretches the limits, but you could buy an air for $300. it's the vehicle you can control and flight around your neighborhood within line of sight and likely you're not going to be running -- you're not going to get sued in all likelihood. the faa has banned the commercial use today, but that effect to be relaxed in 2015 and of course we have an economic incentive. my own personal view, i think this is a wonderful thing because this is deeply transformative and i basically find smartphones. once private industry gets their hands, we'll see really great wonders. however one never get airbus to place limits because of our reactions. were not going to avail ourselves to technology. >> stepanovich, by the way i have a hard lesson income as they relate to you. how would you respond to that in terms of the issues in private c
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3